As the Senate debates the latest immigration “reform” bill some critics have rightly criticized Washington for not enforcing existing immigration laws. They question, “What makes you think you’ll enforce the new laws any better than the current ones?”
Obviously, they can write laws that are very tough but if
they aren’t enforced we are no better off than before.
So, let’s take an example from the 1986 amnesty plan. In 1986 the government made a Social Security
card mandatory for children over 5-years-old.
In 1990 that was changed to 1-year-old.
You cannot claim a dependent on your taxes without one. So it has become customary to get one along
with a birth certificate before the baby leaves the hospital.
So, everyone has
a Social Security card. Presumably there
is a giant database with the information.
When we get a job our employer sends money to the government to build
our account. Every few years we get a
report from the Social Security Administration showing our earnings history and
other information based on our number.
Between the IRS and the
SSA we have a pretty good idea about the payroll activity of every card out
there. And when someone retires we have
additional information. And we report to
the SSA when we die so they don’t keep sending out retirement checks.
So far, so good.
I’m not sure if Washington
gets sloppy or lazy, but we know that these problems regularly occur:
- People make up fake Social Security cards with made-up numbers.
- People use the Social Security numbers of other adults.
- People use the Social Security numbers of their anchor baby children.
- People use the Social Security numbers of other children.
- People use the Social Security numbers of dead people.
And when they do it is perfectly feasible to believe that
the clerk in the personnel office would accept a card without knowing it
doesn’t belong to the person in front of them.
But rather quickly the government knows or should know that
there has been a mistake. Surely made-up
numbers, children and dead people would be easy enough to spot. And enforcement would be fairly
straightforward. The employee has a
problem with their card. Go to the
government and sort it out. After 30
days you either have the issue resolved or you don’t have a job.
If a pattern emerges or the same number pops up in one
geographic area, perhaps ICE gets involved.
But as it now stands, the Social Security number is widely
compromised. Take for example the
blatant and wide-spread fraud described here: http://alienrants.blogspot.com/2012/05/paying-for-global-children.html
You would think that if the government wasn’t going to
require E-Verify at least they would enforce Social Security number fraud. After all, ONE
THIRD of all the foreign-born people living in America
are here illegally.
So, pardon me if I don’t believe Marco Rubio and his Gang
when they talk about tough enforcement measures in the new bill. It takes money, effort and the political will
to enforce the law. And all three of
those are in short supply in Washington. When even the union representing immigration
officers complains that Obama won’t let them do their job you know we have
reached a new low.
No comments:
Post a Comment